3. Vitality Indicators in the Sudbury Francophone Community

Page 5 of 10

 

This section provides a visual representation of the community’s needs and priorities using logic models. A logic model, otherwise known as a flow chart, illustrates the links between the objectives or expected outcomes and the efforts made to enhance vitality in a specific sector (e.g., immigration) in a community. For each target sector, it presents the logic model the task force developed and the indicators corresponding to the expected outcomes. In the following logic models, the shaded areas indicate activities, outputs or outcomes already underway. The non-shaded sections of the table indicate remaining challenges.

3.1. Community Governance

The analysis that helped develop a logic model for the community governance sector is based on five aspects illustrated below as areas of activity.

Promoting successes : The vitality of organizations and community leadership depends on promotional activities. It is anticipated that organizations and their activities will be more visible to the public, as well as to the Anglophone majority, through these initiatives.

Coordination of organizations : Community vitality also depends on more efficient coordination and consultation of existing organizations.

Research on the Francophone community : In order to enhance the vitality of the Francophone community, it is essential to know the community better. As such, it is important to continue conducting studies, and creating and updating organization profiles, directories and activities.

In the short term, these first three areas of activity should result in a vision and a comprehensive development plan for the Sudbury Francophone community. They should be mapped out through processes that culminate in the Estates General (Outcome 1).

Recruitment, training and retention : The organizations must recruit, train and retain volunteers and staff to support and renew themselves (Outcome 2).

Capacity building for organizations : At the same time, organizations must develop governance and management tools to strengthen their leadership (Outcome 3).

A combination of efforts in these five areas of activity should enable governance for and by Francophones in all key sectors (Outcome 4).

In the long term, strengthening community governance should foster a Francophone community that is inclusive, visible, participatory and influential (Outcome 5).

 

Logic Model: Sudbury – Community Governance Sector

Logic Model: Sudbury – Community Governance Sector

 

Evaluation Tool – Community Governance Sector

Expected outcomes

Indicators

Sources

  1. Vision and comprehensive development plan for the Sudbury Francophone community (Estates General)
  1. Francophone community strategic priorities and implementation schedule
  2. Shared community leader opinions on appropriate priorities and schedule
  1. Literature review


  2. Community leader survey
  1. Support or renewal of volunteers and staff
  1. Number of volunteers in Francophone organizations

  2. Percentage of volunteers that took training sessions to strengthen Francophone organizations
  3. Average years of seniority for staff members of francophone organizations
  4. Number of training initiatives in wich staff members of Francophone organizations participated
  1. Organizations’ administrative records or organizational survey
  2. Ibid.


  3. Ibid.


  4. Ibid.
  1. Strengthened organizational leadership
  1. Number of consultation activities of Francophone organizations
  2. Number of common partnerships and initiatives of Francophone organizations
  3. Number of government consultative decision-making bodies in which community organizations participate
  1. Organizational survey

  2. Ibid.


  3. Ibid.
  1. Governance for and by Francophones in all key sectors
  1. Number of organization boards of directors operating in French
  2. Shared community leader opinions on appropriate Francophone governance
  1. Checklist

  2. Community leader survey
  1. Inclusive, visible, participatory and influential Francophone community
  1. Diversity of interests covered by Francophone community organizations (women, youth, children, immigrants, seniors, etc.)
  2. Level of media coverage (English and French) ofFrancophone community activities
  3. Number of organizations, volunteers and activities related to the Francophone community
  4. Number of Francophone organizations’ plans and initiatives that are integrated into government policies
  5. Number of municipal, provincial, territorial and federal representatives from the Francophone community
  1. Literature review



  2. Organizations’ records, press clippings or media coverage study
  3. Checklist


  4. Organizational survey



  5. Checklist


Top of Page

3.2. Health Care

The analysis that led to the development of a logic model for the health care sector focused on three aspects, which are illustrated below as areas of activity.

Health care services: The vitality of Sudbury’s Francophone community with regard to health care depends on the implementation, maintenance or expansion of a series of health care services in French, such as the Centre de santé communautaire, long-term health care centres and home care services. These services will facilitate greater access to health care services in French and shorter waiting lists (Outcome 1).

Health promotion: Beyond health care services, vitality depends on appropriate promotional programs on health and well-being in French, in order to create a healthy environment and lifestyle (Outcome 2).

Health care professionals: To provide health care services in French, training should be provided for professionals in target disciplines and networks should be established. This should result in greater availability and increased recognition of health care professionals (Outcome 3).

In the short term, these efforts should lead to better community use of health care services in French under Francophone governance (Outcome 4). The Francophone community will have a sense of belonging, equitable income and educational levels, and be an integral part of the extended community (Outcome 5).

In the long term, the goal is to ensure a healthy Francophone community (Outcome 6).

Logic Model: Sudbury – Health Care Sector

Logic Model: Sudbury – Health Care Sector

 

Evaluation Tool – Health Care Sector

Expected outcomes

Indicators

Sources

  1. Greater public access to health care in French and shorter waiting lists
  1. Number of health care institutions that are Francophone or designated bilingual
  2. Number and types of health care services offered in French (primary, secondary and tertiary)
  3. Shorter waiting lists for health care services


  4. Level of use of French in health care services and level of satisfaction
  1. Checklist


  2. Interviews with health care authorities

  3. Health care institutions’ administrative records or interviews with health care authorities
  4. Sample client survey
  1. Healthy environment and lifestyle
  1. Number and range of health and well-being promotion programs in French in the community
  2. Level of use of health and well-being promotion programs in French in the community
  1. Interviews with health care authorities

  2. Health care institutions’ administrative records and health care programs or interviews with health care authorities
  1. Greater availability and increased recognition of health care professionals
  1. Existence and nature of health care networks in French in the community
  2. Number of Francophones working in local or regional health care governance structures
  3. Number of designated bilingual positions in regional health care governance structures
  1. Checklist

  2. Ibid.


  3. Interviews with health care authorities
  1. Better community use of health care services in French under Francophone governance
  1. Number of health care services offered under Francophone governance
  2. Perception of the main obstacles to accessing health care services in French
  1. Checklist


  2. Francophone community leader survey
  1. Francophone community has a sense of belonging, equitable income and educational levels, and is an integral part of the extended community
  1. Comparison between income levels of Anglophones and Francophones
  2. Comparison between education levels of Anglophones and Francophones
  3. Perception of Francophones of their integration in the community
  4. Percentage of Francophones that use social support networks
  1. Census statistics

  2. Ibid.


  3. Francophone community leader survey
  4. Data on Statistics Canada health indicators8


Top of Page

3.3. Immigration

The analysis that led to the development of a logic model for the immigration sector is based on three main aspects, illustrated below as two areas of activity. In this community study, the expression “newcomers” is used rather than “immigrants” as it also includes migrants from other Canadian provinces.

Government policies: Immigration is, first and foremost, a government jurisdiction. It is up to the federal, provincial and municipal governments to approve policies and take measures to promote the recruitment of Francophone immigrants. In the Greater Sudbury area, two points of entry should receive support for this purpose: Collège Boréal and Laurentian University. In the short term, this support should help increase the number of newcomers (Outcome 1).

Community support: Community action that supports immigration is of strategic importance. Increased pressure on governments, awareness-raising among the Francophone community and newcomers, this community support, in addition to the action of the Contact interculturel francophone de Sudbury, should, in the short term, help this organization to gain government and community recognition and support (Outcome 2). Moreover, community lobby groups should help increase the number of newcomers.

Reception and integration of newcomers: Contact intercultural francophone de Sudbury has the mandate of welcoming and fostering the integration of newcomers. It is also called upon to build a directory of services and employment resources, as well as facilitate access to language training. Through its activities, this organization should contribute to the retention of Francophone newcomers in Sudbury (Outcome 3). Since there are so few newcomers, the organization must direct them to the appropriate services and groups to foster the creation of a social support network (Outcome 4).

In the medium term, a combination of these efforts should foster a Francophone community that welcomes newcomers (Outcome 5), and help newcomers reach their full socioeconomic and educational potential (Outcome 6). In the longer term, the contribution and integration of newcomers will lead to an expanded and enriched Francophone community (Outcome 7).

Logic Model: Sudbury – Immigration Sector

Logic Model: Sudbury – Immigration Sector

Evaluation Tool – Immigration Sector

Expected outcomes

Indicators

Sources

  1. Increased number of newcomers
  1. Net Francophone immigration
  2. Percentage of French-speaking newcomers
  1. Census statistics
  2. Census statistics or records of Contact interculturel francophone de Sudbury
  1. Government and community recognition and support for Contact interculturel francophone de Sudbury
  1. Annual base funding (not based on short-term project)
  1. Interviews with organization authorities
  1. Retention of Francophone newcomers
  1. Average length of stay of newcomers
  1. Records of Contact interculturel francophone de Sudbury or newcomer survey
  1. Social support network in the newcomers’ community
  1. Level of satisfaction of newcomers with their social network
  1. Records of Contact interculturel francophone de Sudbury or newcomer survey
  1. Francophone community that welcomes newcomers
  1. Percentage of Francophone newcomers who choose French as the language of instruction
  2. Percentage of Francophone organizations with newcomers as members of their boards of directors
  3. Percentage of Francophone organizations with newcomers on staff
  1. School records or records of Contact interculturel francophone de Sudbury
  2. Interviews with organization authorities

  3. Ibid.
  1. Newcomers reach their full socioeconomic and educational potential
  1. Level of satisfaction of newcomers with the recognition of their education and experience
  2. Average time required to find a job or start a business
  3. Unemployment rate among newcomers
  1. Records of Contact interculturel francophone de Sudbury or newcomer survey
  2. Ibid.

  3. Ibid.
  1. Expanded and enriched Francophone community
  1. Demographic growth rate
  2. Number of Francophone cultural events containing a multicultural component
  1. Census statistics
  2. Literature review or interviews with organization authorities


Top of Page

3.4. Access to Government Services

The analysis that led to the development of a logic model for the health care sector focused on three aspects, which are illustrated below as areas of activity.

Awareness raising among public servants: A great part of the efforts must be devoted to raising awareness among public servants at various levels of government, to ensure there is access to government services in French. This awareness raising should result in designated bilingual positions, the introduction of new bilingual government services, mechanisms facilitating Francophone community consultation and studies on the community.

Language training for public servants: Another important aspect of accessing government services is ensuring the French-language skills of public servants through training and retention activities.

Valuation of Francophone public servants: One of the challenges is to make Francophone public servants feel valued to ensure that their workplace is conducive to the use of French. Awareness-raising and networking activities, as well as the creation of a bilingual working environment, should help. In the short term, these efforts will make public authorities accountable and encourage an active offer of enhanced and adapted services (Outcome 1).

In the medium term, active offer should, in return, foster active demand for French services from Francophones (Outcome 2).

In the longer term, Francophones will have access, in French, to the government resources, services and programs they need (Outcome 3).

Logic Model: Sudbury – Access to Government Services Sector

Logic Model: Sudbury – Access to Government Services

Evaluation Tool – Access to Government Services Sector

Expected outcomes

Indicators

Sources

  1. Accountable public authorities and active offer of enhanced and adapted services
  1. Number and variety of modes of access to government services in French
  2. Number of government documents available in French
  3. Percentage of active visual and verbal offer in government offices
  4. Number of language courses offered to public servants

  5. Level of knowledge and perception of public servants of the relevance of services in French
  6. Number of Francophone community consultations on the accessibility and quality of government services
  1. Public service records or interviews with various government authorities
  2. Ibid.

  3. Direct observation investigation

  4. Public service records or interviews with various government authorities
  5. Public service employee survey


  6. Public service records or interviews with various government authorities
  1. Active demand for French services
  1. Rate of use of government services in French

  2. Number of complaints regarding government services in French
  1. Public service records or interviews with various government authorities
  2. Ibid.
  1. Francophones have access, in French, to the government resources, services and programs they need
  1. Number of government offices offering services in French

  2. Number of bilingual positions in the public service
  3. Average distance from home to government service point offering services in French
  4. Public perception of the importance, access, quality and evolution of government services in French
  1. Public service records or interviews with various government authorities
  2. Ibid.

  3. Sample client survey


  4. Ibid.
  1. Social support network in the newcomers’ community
  1. Level of satisfaction of newcomers with their social network
  1. Records of Contact interculturel francophone de Sudbury or newcomer survey
  1. Francophone community that welcomes newcomers
  1. Percentage of Francophone newcomers who choose French as the language of instruction
  2. Percentage of Francophone organizations with newcomers as members of their boards of directors
  3. Percentage of Francophone organizations with newcomers on staff
  1. School records or records of Contact interculturel francophone de Sudbury
  2. Interviews with organization authorities

  3. Ibid.
  1. Newcomers reach their full socioeconomic and educational potential
  1. Level of satisfaction of newcomers with the recognition of their education and experience
  2. Average time required to find a job or start a business
  3. Unemployment rate among newcomers
  1. Records of Contact interculturel francophone de Sudbury or newcomer survey
  2. Ibid.

  3. Ibid.
  1. Expanded and enriched Francophone community
  1. Demographic growth rate
  2. Number of Francophone cultural events containing a multicultural component
  1. Census statistics
  2. Literature review or interviews with organization authorities


Notes

8 Statistics Canada data on health make little use of the language variable. The only reliable source in this respect is the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS), but the data is not broken down by province and territory: see CANSIM, table 105-0111: Profile of Linguistic Minorities of the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS 1.1 and 2.1), (mother tongue and first official language spoken), by gender, Canada, province and territory, occasional data. It may be worthwhile for official language communities to request that these data be collected and published, pursuant to the Official Languages Act.

Previous Page

Table of contents

Next Page